首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

司法裁判事实认定中的非理性因素
引用本文:张海燕. 司法裁判事实认定中的非理性因素[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2011, 0(6): 92-96
作者姓名:张海燕
作者单位:山东大学法学院,山东济南,250100
基金项目:教育部青年基金项目(10YJC820151); 国家社科基金项目(08BFX070)
摘    要:在司法裁判事实认定中,裁判者基于自身所具有的自然属性和社会属性,会不可避免地掺入一些个人的非理性因素,如潜意识、思维定势、个人情感、个性气质和欲望需求等.裁判者非理性因素在事实认定中犹如一把“双刃剑”,既能发挥支配和促进、诱导和激励、选择和评价、调节和控制等积极作用,也存在片面性、或然性和盲目性等消极影响,因此,有必要通过完善裁判者教育培训制度,建立司法判决理由公开制度和落实合议制、陪审制和回避制等措施来进行有效导控.

关 键 词:司法裁判  事实认定  非理性因素

Irrational Factors in the Process of Fact-finding of Judicial Adjudication
ZHANG Hai-yan. Irrational Factors in the Process of Fact-finding of Judicial Adjudication[J]. Journal of Beijing Administrative College, 2011, 0(6): 92-96
Authors:ZHANG Hai-yan
Affiliation:ZHANG Hai-yan
Abstract:In the process of fact-finding of judicial adjudication,the judges will be inevitably affected by some personal irrational factors basing on their natural and social attributes,such as subconscious,thinking set,emotions,personalities and requirements,etc.Like a double-edged sword,these irrational factors both can play a positive function in dominant and promotion,induction and incentive,selection and evaluation,and regulation and control and have negative influences of one-sidedness,probability and blindnes...
Keywords:judicial adjudication  fact-finding  irrational factors  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号