四要件犯罪构成的结构性缺失及其颠覆——从正当行为切入的学术史考察

对于我国目前的四要件的犯罪构成理论是否应当加以推倒重构,在刑法学界存在较大的争议。从正当行为的体系性地位出发,采用学术史的考察方法进行分析,可以发现正当行为在四要件的犯罪构成中地位之阙如,使得极度宣称以社会危害性为中心的犯罪构成实际上具有形式化的特征,这是四要件的犯罪构成的结构性缺失。正是这一结构性缺失决定了四要件的犯罪构成不可避免地被颠覆的最终命运,本文只不过是"发现"并从逻辑上论证了这一客观事实。

Faults and Abolition of the Doctrine of Four Elements of Crime:From the Perspective of Reasonable Act

Whether the theory underlying the four elements of crime in China's existing criminal law should be overthrown is being heatedly debated among academics. From the perspective of systematic status of reasonable act and assuming the observation way of academic history,this paper points out the demerits of reasonable act in the structure of the four elements of crime which have made the constitution of crime centered on harms characterized by formality,i.e.,a gap in the structure of four elements of crime. It is the structural gap that determines that the doctrine of four elements of crime is doomed and the purpose of the paper is only to "discover" and logically certify this objective fact.