| 论作为侵权行为法价值基础的矫正正义 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王福友,刘雪松. 论作为侵权行为法价值基础的矫正正义[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2006, 1(5): 1-7 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王福友 刘雪松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 哈尔滨商业大学,法学院,哈尔滨,150010 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 矫正正义与分配正义并不是分别代表立法正义与司法正义,矫正正义也不是以分配正义为前提,二者是法律配置资源的两种方式,矫正正义意味着损害的解决与行为"不公"相联系.过错责任原则所体现的矫正正义只是一个特定的形态,严格责任的存在基础仍然是矫正正义.应该把矫正正义确立为侵权行为法的价值基础,以树立侵权行为法的独立品格,并使其不断进行制度创新.
|
| 关 键 词： | 侵权行为法 矫正正义 过错责任 严格责任 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7966(2006)05-0001-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-07-08 |
Corrective Justice: Fundamental Values for Torts Law |
| |
| WANG Fu-you,LIU Xue-song. Corrective Justice: Fundamental Values for Torts Law[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2006, 1(5): 1-7 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Fu-you LIU Xue-song |
| |
| Abstract: | The corrective justice and distributive justice,as the article fingers,do not correspond with the legislative justice and judicial justice respectively and,corrective justice does not condition on distributive justice.They are in nature two ways for law distributing resources,and corrective justice implies that resolution of injuries draws upon unfairness of conduct.Corrective justice as reflected by fault liability doctrine,is in essence merely a specific form,while the base of strict liability doctrine is still correlative justice.It's recommended that corrective justice shall be established as the fundamental values for torts law system,for the purpose of forming the unique features of which,and helping bring out continuous innovations on the system. |
| |
| Keywords: | Tort Law corrective justice fault liability doctrine strict liability doctrine |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
