首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论宅基地使用权性质
引用本文:王崇敏. 论宅基地使用权性质[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2014, 0(5): 14-21
作者姓名:王崇敏
作者单位:海南大学,海南海口570228
基金项目:本文系国家社科基金项目“我国农村宅基地使用权现代化构建”阶段性成果之一(项目编号:09bfx028).
摘    要:宅基地使用权是宅基地使用权人依法享有的占有、使用农村集体土地建造住宅和附属设施并长期保有的权利。国内对宅基地使用权性质的认识有着不同学说,但要结合我国土地政策和现实农村经济社会发展之现实进行认识。宅基地使用权是一种准所有权,是物权效力十分强大的他物权,其类似于自物权。尽管《物权法》将宅基地使用权定性为用益物权,但是我国立法文本中的用益物权与大陆法系立法上的用益物权存在本质的差异。公共利益对土地及相关权利结构的设计不具有决定性,不能否定宅基地使用权的私权属性。

关 键 词:宅基地  宅基地使用权  性质  公共利益

On the Nature of Right to Use Residential Land
Wang Chongmin. On the Nature of Right to Use Residential Land[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2014, 0(5): 14-21
Authors:Wang Chongmin
Affiliation:Wang Chongmin ( Law School ,Hainan University,Haikou Hainan 570228 )
Abstract:Right to use residential land is a long - term retained legitimate fight of the person who has the fight to use residential land on legal possession, on legal use of rural collective land and on legal construction of resi- dential house and other ancillary facilities. There are various theories on the nature of right to use residential land in mainland China, but we need to understand it on the combination of the land policy of China and the status of economic and social development in rural areas. The right to use residential land is a quasi fight of ownership ,and a "Jura in re Aliana" ,similar to "jus in re propria" ,which is a powerful real right. Though the Real Right Law of PRC defines the fight to use residential land as an usufructuary right, there exists difference in the nature of usufructuary fight in the legislative text of China and the one in the Continental Law System. Public interest is not decisive to the design of land and relative right structure, therefore, it cannot negate the nature of private fight in the fight to use residential land.
Keywords:residential land  right to use residential land  nature  public interest
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号