| 再论指示交付及其后果 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔建远. 再论指示交付及其后果[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2014, 0(4): 62-67 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔建远 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学法学院,北京100084 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国物权法第26条关于指示交付的规定有利有弊,对于其利,必应否定;对于其弊,在解释论上,应最大限度地限缩其中所言“法”的范围,将若干第三人无权占有的情形视为“依法”,而不作为“违法”对待。不宜一概否定指示交付场合让与物权的返还请求权。“出让人转让被人盗窃或遗失的手表一块,此时转让的返还请求权应包括对第三人的所有物返还请求权”之说,是合适的,不应否认。
|
| 关 键 词： | 指示交付 债权的返还请求权 物权的返还请求权 无占有动产的让与 |
A Further Discussion of Indication Delivery and Its Consequences |
| |
| Cui Jianyuan. A Further Discussion of Indication Delivery and Its Consequences[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2014, 0(4): 62-67 |
| |
| Authors: | Cui Jianyuan |
| |
| Affiliation: | Cui Jianyuan ( Law School, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084) |
| |
| Abstract: | The provision concerning indication delivery in article 26 of China＇ s property law has its advantagesand disadvantages. For its advantages, they should be denied, while for its disadvantages, in theory, they shouldnarrow to the largest extent the range of the word ＂law＂, treating the several situations that the third party hasno fight to possess the property as ＂in accordance with the law＂ rather than ＂illegal＂. It is not proper to totallydeny the delivery occasions to claim the return the real rights. The statement ＂when the transferor transfers alost or stolen watch ,the right of claim to return the original object includes claims against the third person＂ issuitable, and it should not be denied. |
| |
| Keywords: | indication delivery the right of claim to return the creditor＇ s rights the right of claim to return thereal rights transfer personal property of no possession |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
