Religious Characteristics and the Death Penalty |
| |
Authors: | Monica K. Miller R. David Hayward |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Criminal Justice and Social Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Mailstop 214, Reno, NV 89557, USA;(2) Interdisciplinary PhD Program in Social Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Using one mock trial scenario, this study investigated whether religious and demographic factors were related to death penalty attitudes and sentencing verdicts. Those who favored the death penalty differed from those who had doubts about the penalty in gender, affiliation, fundamentalism, evangelism, literal Biblical interpretism, beliefs about God’s attitudes toward murders, and perceptions of how their religious groups felt about the death penalty. These relationships generally held after mock jurors were death qualified. Gender, fundamentalism, literal interpretism, beliefs about God’s death penalty position, and perceptions of how one’s religious group felt about the death penalty predicted death penalty sentencing verdicts. Future research could determine whether using peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors based on religion can help lawyers choose a more favorable jury. The present research was supported by the National Science Foundation award number 0351811, the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, the American Psychology-Law Society, and the University of Nebraska Law-Psychology Program. This research was presented at the 2006 conference of the American Psychology-Law Society. The authors are grateful for the research assistance of Nick Fanning and Beth Herschlag and for the helpful comments from Brian Bornstein, Rich Wiener, Bob Schopp, Dick Dienstbier, and several anonymous reviewers. |
| |
Keywords: | Religion Death penalty Jurors Trial Jury decision making |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|