再论诉讼担当——以担当人和被担当人在实体法和程序法上的关系为视角

对诉讼担当概念的理解不一致造成了我国学者对诉讼担当范围和类型的分歧。对诉讼担当的学理分类分歧主要存在于任意诉讼担当之中,因而建议采＂与实体权一起进行诉讼追行委托的诉讼担当＂与＂仅仅就诉讼追行进行委托的诉讼担当＂的分类,以达到诉讼担当内涵与外延的一致。从法定担当和任意担当的角度探索诉讼担当的具体形态,分析诉讼担当人与被担当人实体法和程序法上的关系,只要符合诉讼担当的概念、制度的设置目的并具有诉讼担当的功能都应当属于诉讼担当。

Again On Litigation Undertaking System

Litigation undertaking system in civil action plays an important role in solving the segregation of civil subject and litigation subject. With the different comprehension in the concept of litigation undertaking, our country’s scholars have different views on the range of application. The main divergence on the theoretic classification of litigation taking is on the discretional undertaking. And the classification of "the litigation undertaking with both substantive right and litigious right" and "the litigation undertaking with only litigious right" can help to reach the integration of intension and extension of the concept. This paper illustrates the application of the litigation undertaking through legal undertaking and discretional undertaking. By analyzing the relationship between litigation undertaker and undertaken-person in substantive law and procedural law, the paper comes to the conclusion that the action which can match the concept and the aim of undertaking system and has the function of undertaking can be regard as litigation undertaking.