| 论民事诉讼与行政诉讼举证责任分配的合理性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 包成. 论民事诉讼与行政诉讼举证责任分配的合理性[J]. 新疆警官高等专科学校学报, 2010, 30(3): 39-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1622-1195.2010.03.011 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 包成 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 新疆警官高等专科学校,教务处,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830013 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 诉讼作为一种社会解纷机制,其主要价值在于为社会利益争端的解决提供一套体现公平和正义的程序规则。民事争议和行政争议在性质上是不同的,它们所体现的社会利益关系各有其特殊性。鉴于此,民事诉讼与行政诉讼在举证责任的分配上做出不同的设计,在举证责任分配上,民事诉讼贯彻＂谁主张谁举证＂,行政诉讼由＂被告负举证责任＂,这不同的表述体现了共同的价值取向：救济和保护弱者。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民事诉讼 行政诉讼 举证责任 合理性 |
On Rationality of Distribution of Onus Probandi Responsibility in Civil and Administrative Litigation |
| |
| BAO Cheng. On Rationality of Distribution of Onus Probandi Responsibility in Civil and Administrative Litigation[J]. Journal of Xinj iang Police Officers’Academy, 2010, 30(3): 39-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1622-1195.2010.03.011 |
| |
| Authors: | BAO Cheng |
| |
| Affiliation: | BAO Cheng(Educational Administration Office,Xinjiang Police officers＇ Academy,Urumqi,Xinjiang,830013,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | As a depute solution system,the value of lawsuit lies in providing a set of procedures and a system embodying fairness and justice.The features of civil and administrative litigation are different.And they represent different social interests.Due to this,here are different plans on distribution of responsibility in onus probandi.Civil litigation adopts ＂whoever protests should quote＂ while administrative litigation insists ＂the accused responsible for offering proof＂,which embody the same common value： relieve and protect the weak. |
| |
| Keywords: | civil litigation administration litigation Onus Probandi rationality |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
