| 法律冲安时的适用标准——以刘家海诉交警部门案为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘振宇. 法律冲安时的适用标准——以刘家海诉交警部门案为例[J]. 行政与法, 2011, 0(6) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘振宇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 上海师范大学,上海,200234 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 法律毕竞是人为制定的规则,法律之间的冲突从某种意义上是不可避免的.司法,作为规则之治的终结者,自然需要对冲突的法律进行选择适用.尽管立法法已经出台,但现实的司法判决表明,法律冲突时的适用标准依然存在问题.刘家海诉交警部门案就是一例.通过将该案的争论焦点渐次展开可以发现,立法法中貌似明确的适用标准起码可以进行三个方面的补充:一是原则考量的引入,二是"立法权"替代"立法机关"进行解释,三是社会效果考量的必要.
|
| 关 键 词： | 刘家海诉交警部门案 法律冲突 适用标准 |
The Criterions to Conflict of laws: Take Liu Jiahai v.Nanning Transportation Police Department as an Example |
| |
| Liu Zhenyu. The Criterions to Conflict of laws: Take Liu Jiahai v.Nanning Transportation Police Department as an Example[J]. Public Administration & Law, 2011, 0(6) |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Zhenyu |
| |
| Abstract: | In a sense,conflict of laws is inevitable for laws are artificial rules.Judicature,as the terminator of the rule of law,must select among the conflicting laws.Though Legislation Law of the People's Republic of China has taken effect,the criterions to conflict of laws still has some flaw.Liu Jiahai v.Nanning Transportation Police Department is a typical case.With analysing the bones of contention,we would find there are three parts needed to supplement.First,principles need to be considered.Second,legislativ... |
| |
| Keywords: | Liu Jiahai v.Nanning Transportation Police Department conflict of laws criterion |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
