Enter at your own risk: free movement of EU citizens in practice |
| |
Authors: | Anita Heindlmaier |
| |
Affiliation: | Salzburg Centre of European Union Studies (SCEUS), University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria |
| |
Abstract: | The citizenship jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice has raised hopes for a more social Europe and triggered fierce debates about ‘social tourism’. The article analyses how this case law is applied by EU member state administrations and argues that they are actively containing the Court’s influence. As a result, rather than reconciling the logics of ‘opening’ and ‘closure’, they are heading towards an uneasy coexistence between free movement and exclusive welfare states. The argument here is illustrated with empirical evidence from Austria and Germany. Although both countries have taken different approaches to EU migrants’ residency and social rights, they produce similar effects in practice: increasingly, EU migrants are being tolerated as residents with precarious status without access to minimum subsistence benefits. Ironically, attempts to restrict residency rights have resulted in a temporary extension of EU migrants’ access to welfare in some instances. |
| |
Keywords: | European Court of Justice Europeanisation EU citizenship member state administrations welfare rights |
|
|