首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

初论我国刑事诉讼中设立中间程序的合理性
引用本文:陈卫东.初论我国刑事诉讼中设立中间程序的合理性[J].当代法学,2004(4).
作者姓名:陈卫东
作者单位:中国人民大学法学院,中国人民大学法学院 北京100872 韩红兴,北京100872
摘    要:公诉权从本质上来说是一种诉讼的请求权 ,作为一种公权力和诉权结合的权力形态 ,一方面要求从公益原则出发扩大公诉权自由裁量权的范围 ,以发挥非刑罚化矫正犯罪的功能 ,另一方面 ,为防止公诉权的滥用 ,必须使公诉权接受司法审查 ,以达到保障人权之功效。由于我国公诉审查机制存在严重的缺陷 ,难以发挥其应有的价值。因此 ,从总体上重构我国刑事审前程序 ,建立中间程序 ,发挥中间程序的多重价值功能 ,实现我国刑事诉讼程序的科学化、合理化。

关 键 词:公诉权  公诉审查  中间程序

The Rationality of The Constrution of Interlocutory Proceedings in Criminal Procedure of China
CHEN Wei-dong,HAN Hong-xing.The Rationality of The Constrution of Interlocutory Proceedings in Criminal Procedure of China[J].Contemporary Law Review,2004(4).
Authors:CHEN Wei-dong  HAN Hong-xing
Abstract:The power of public prosecution in nature is the the right to claim a litigation, which has the gualities of the public power and litigation and requires that, on one hand, according to the principle of public benefits, the extent of the non-prosecution discretionary power should be expanded in order to perform the function of non-punblishment; on the other hand, in order to prevent from abusing, the power of public prosecution should be reviewed by jurisdiction so as to protect civil rights. Owing to the drawbacks of the mechanism of the public prosecution reviewed by jurisdiction in China, many values are not realized. As a result, wholly reconsturcting the crimial pretrial proceedings and setting up the interlocutory proceedings which fully realize its values are essential to achieve the scintific rationality of the crimial procedure of China.
Keywords:Prosecution  the public prosecution reviewed by jurisdiction  the interLocutory proceedings
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号