庭前公诉案卷移送制度改革新论——以庭审实质化为中心的讨论

大陆法系的案卷移送主义并没有排除法官预断,英美法系的起诉状一本主义也没有完全禁止法官庭前接触案件信息,但由于两大法系存在保障庭审实质化的各种原则与制度机制,因此这并没有导致两大法系的庭审程序流于形式。不管是在比较法的视域中,还是在我国当下的制度环境之下,很难绝对地认为我国现行庭前公诉案卷移送制度存在缺陷,从庭审实质化的角度来看,当下更为紧要的是加强庭审程序的建设,而不在于改革庭前公诉案卷移送制度,追求绝对地排除法官预断或禁止法官庭前接触案件信息。

A New Reform on the System of Dossier Transfer in Pretrial——A Discussion on the Center of Making Trial Substantively

Either dossier transfer in continental law system excludes judge's prejudice or indictment transfer forbids judge's having access to the case information thoroughly in Anglo-Saxon law system. While there are some principles and institutions to guarantee the trial substantively,the trial processes in both of the law families have not been formalized. Accordingly,no matter in the perspective of comparative law or in the view of current China's institutional surrounding,we can never give an absolute viewpoint that China's dossier transfer has some institutional defects. From the viewpoint of making the trial process substantialized,currently it is more urgent to pay critical attention to how to enforce the trial process more and more substantively than how to reform the dossier transfer in pretrial context and to pursue for excluding judge's prejudice or forbidding judge's accessing to case information before trial absolutely.