论行政诉讼上的合理性审查

在行政诉讼上由"滥用职权""明显不当"构建的合理性审查,就是实质合法性审查。我国行政诉讼法第70条胪列的各种审查标准实际上暗含着适用次序,形式合法审查标准先于实质合法审查标准,"滥用职权"先于"明显不当"。这对于隔断随意流动、阐释各自的内涵与边界、形成较为稳定的解释结构至关重要。为了进一步科学合理地界定"滥用职权""明显不当",对于"滥用职权"的解释应当去主观化,受限于变更判决的"木桶效应",不宜无限扩大"明显不当"的内涵。

On the Review of Reasonableness in Administrative Litigation

In administrative litigation,the review of reasonableness on the ground of"abuse of power"and"obvious misconduct"is in fact a substantive review of legality.The various review standards listed in Article 70 of the Administrative Litigation Law actually imply the order of their application.The standard for the formal legal examination precedes in application the one for substantive legal examination,and"abuse of power"precedes"obvious misconduct,"which is very important for preventing random flow among them,for explaining their respective connotation and boundary,and for forming a more stable interpretation structure.To be further scientifically and reasonably defined,the"abuse of power"should be done away with subjectivity,and the"obvious misconduct",conditioned by the"Cannikin’s law,"shall not be over-stretched in its connotation in the change of the judgment.