首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

人工智能时代的主体性之忧:法理学如何回应
引用本文:陆幸福. 人工智能时代的主体性之忧:法理学如何回应[J]. 比较法研究, 2022, 0(1): 27-38
作者姓名:陆幸福
作者单位:西南政法大学行政法学院
基金项目:2020年度国家社科基金项目“类案同判机制研究”(20XFX001)的阶段性研究成果。
摘    要:近代以来,人超越于他物的主体性得以确立,其内容包括不可侵犯的人格尊严、自主决定、在社会和政治生活中具有重要性以及基于自身目的利用自然。然而,人工智能已经从以下方面挑战了人的主体性:冲击了人格尊严的基础,削弱了自主决定,降低了人在社会生活中的重要性。因此,亟需法理学基于整体性反思和价值视角予以回应。法理学应采取的立场包括:注重人的道德主体性以彰显其独特性,明确反对赋予人工智能法律人格,坚持对人工智能涉主体性应用的合法性审查。

关 键 词:主体性  人工智能  法理学  人格尊严  自主决定

Worries about Subjectivity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Responses from Jurisprudence
Lu Xingfu. Worries about Subjectivity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Responses from Jurisprudence[J]. Journal of Comparative Law, 2022, 0(1): 27-38
Authors:Lu Xingfu
Abstract:Since modern times,man’s subjectivity that transcends any other things has been established.It includes inviolable human dignity,self-determination,importance in social and political life,and the exploitation of nature for human purposes.However,it has been greatly challenged by artificial intelligence,which has shaken the foundation of man’s dignity,weakened man’s self-determination,and downplayed the importance of human beings in social activities.Therefore,the response from jurisprudence is badly needed that is based on a holistic reflection and value consideration.The jurisprudence should emphasize man’s moral agency to highlight its uniqueness,expressly oppose granting legal personality to artificial intelligence,and insist on reviewing the legality of AI application that involves artificial intelligence.
Keywords:subjectivity  artificial intelligence  jurisprudence  human dignity  self-determination
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号