首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

滥用职权罪主体要件问题研究
引用本文:谭绍木,李敏. 滥用职权罪主体要件问题研究[J]. 湖南公安高等专科学校学报, 2006, 18(1): 35-38
作者姓名:谭绍木  李敏
作者单位:1. 中国人民大学法学院,北京,100872
2. 南昌大学法学院,江西,南昌,330029
基金项目:江西省社科十五(2005年)规划项目研究成果,基金项目编号:05SH11
摘    要:现代国家须以制度来体现科层制,体现政治权力。在我国,国家公职人员代表国家来行使公共权力。为了对公共权力的行使进行规制,刑法对滥用职权罪进行了规定,但学界对这个罪的主体问题的认识仍然存在相当多的分歧。“国家工作人员”不宜作为一个法律概念来界定,具体到滥用职权罪更是如此。而以“国家公职人员”取代“国家工作人员”,则能体现其作为法律概念本身的确定性和科学性。但语词的改变从来不能够代替社会现实的改造,如果只是改变表述方式,其意义仍然非常有限。

关 键 词:权力  滥用职权罪  国家工作人员
文章编号:1008-7575(2006)01-0035-04
修稿时间:2005-12-06

Research into the Main Problems in the Crime of Abusing Power
TAN Shao-mu,LI Min. Research into the Main Problems in the Crime of Abusing Power[J]. Journal of Huan Public Security College, 2006, 18(1): 35-38
Authors:TAN Shao-mu  LI Min
Abstract:The system of modern countries should reflect bureaucratic institution and political power.In China it is national civil servants who represent government to exercise public power.In order to stipulate the performance in public power,criminal law makes certain rules in the crime of abusing power.However the academic circle differs a lot in main parts of this very crime.This article holds that national working personnel should not be delimited as a legal concept.So is with the crime of abusing power.The term national civil servants rather than national working personnel is more precise and scientific as a legal concept itself.It is true that the change of term could never replace the reform in social reality.Therefore it could exert very limited significant if we just alter the expression.
Keywords:power  crime of abusing power  national working personnel
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号