首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论民事裁判的实体公正
引用本文:汪时银,储润霞. 论民事裁判的实体公正[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报, 2008, 7(6): 29-32
作者姓名:汪时银  储润霞
作者单位:池州市岳西县人民法院,安徽,池州,246600;池州市岳西县人民法院,安徽,池州,246600
摘    要:近年来,我国法学界和司法工作者在纠正“重实体、轻程序”现象的同时,产生了过分强调程序公正的倾向,并导致司法裁判不公现象的增多。从实证的角度看.程序公正是实体公正的基础和前提.实体公正是程序公正的依归和检验标准,二者相互依存、相互促进。程序公正与实体公正是一致的,但有时也会产生冲突,这时,法官就要根据价值衡量来决定取舍,不能简单地一律程序公正优先.也不能把实体公正作为惟一的追求。从我国的实际情况出发,在民事诉讼实务中要实现裁判的实体公正,必须在民事裁判结果中体现法律和情理的统一。以取得裁判法律效果和社会效果的统一。实现法律公正与社会主流正义观的统一。

关 键 词:民事裁判  实体公正  程序公正

On the Substantive Justice of Civil Administration
Wang Shiyin,Chu Runxia. On the Substantive Justice of Civil Administration[J]. Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Pollce Officers, 2008, 7(6): 29-32
Authors:Wang Shiyin  Chu Runxia
Affiliation:(Yuexi People's Court of Chizhou City, Chizhou Anhni 246600)
Abstract:Recently,the law circle and the judicial personnel's correcting the fact of more substance,and less procedure generates a trend of over-emphasized procedural justice,and leads to more unfair judicial administration.In practical experience,the procedural justice should be the foundation and premise of the substantive justice,and the substantive justice should be the goal and criterion of the procedural justice,which are independent each other.Therefore,when conflicts occur,the judge should determine it accor...
Keywords:civil administration  substantive justice  procedural justice  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号