“直接适用的法“与公共秩序保留制度比较研究

在国际私法中,适用直接适用的法和公共秩序保留制度都可以达到排除外国法,从而维护本国的主权和利益的效果,其中"直接适用的法"作为20世纪中期兴起的一种理论学说,反映了随着国家职能的加强,国家要求进一步加强对政治、经济、生活干预的要求.而传统国际私法中的公共保留制度在近来也发生了变化.作为能够达到同样目的的两种手段,两者之间关系如何?是否具有互换性?本文拟就此问题进行分析阐述,并对公共秩序保留制度中间接限制模式的存在提出新的见解.

Comparing Studies of "the Direct Suitable Law" and the Public Order Retention System

In international private law,to suit the direct suitable law and the public order retention system may both achieve removing the foreign law and maintaining one country' sovereignty and the benefit,as new theory appeared in medium stage of 20th century," the direct suitable law " shows that along with the consolidation of state function, the state request to strengthen intervention on politics,economics,and the life.However,the public peace and order retention system in the traditional international private law also had change recently.As two methods with the similar goal,what is the relation between them? Do they have the interchangeability? This article give analysis and elaboration in light of this,and the new opinion on the existence of the indirect limit pattern in the public peace and order retention system.