论宪法裁决中的实体价值——以美国宪法司法审查的理论解说为中心

司法审查是美国法律制度的一个重要特征。然而，自马伯里诉麦迪逊案确立该制度之日起，支持和反对司法审查的理论争论就从未停止过，从而形成解释主义和非解释主义之分，实体价值在司法审查中的作用即为该争论之一部分。通过梳理和解读当前具有影响的支持者的理论和反对者的质疑，本文从宪法和法理的角度对两者之间的联系与区别作出检讨。而且，对司法审查理论依据的梳理，有助于理解该制度的理论发展动向。

On the Substantive Value of Constitutional Adjudication:on the Basis of Theoretical Interpretation of Judicial Review in US

One of the significant characteristics of the American legal system is judicial review.However,since it was established by the decision of Marbury v.Madison,theoretical debate has never come to a stop,which can be classified as interpretivism and noninterpretivism.This article points out that the issue whether substantive value should play a role in judicial review is part of the debate.While some legal theorists try to justify the rationality of judicial review on different grounds,others challenge that su...