首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国住宅权行政法保护缺失分析
引用本文:肖泽晟.我国住宅权行政法保护缺失分析[J].行政法学研究,2006(1):43-50.
作者姓名:肖泽晟
作者单位:南京大学法学院,江苏,南京,210093
摘    要:住宅权作为宪法规定的一项自由权,尚未扩张到生存权意义上的公民“对住宅”的权利,对该权利的保护,目前还是行政法的盲区。即使是对自由权意义上的住宅权的保护,我国的行政法也存在很多缺陷:一是《治安管理处罚法》等法律在保护公民的住宅免受他人非法侵入上还存在住宅范围不清、“非法侵入”的标准不明等缺陷;二是《城市房屋拆迁管理条例》和《土地管理法》在尊重公民住宅权上也存在不少疏忽;三是住宅权事实上是一种没有救济的权利,目前只能将住宅权降格为财产权并依据《行政诉讼法》和《国家赔偿法》的规定获得很少的救济。

关 键 词:住宅权  行政法  非法侵入

Analysis on Deficiency of Administrative Law Protection of Dwelling Right in China
XIAO Ze-sheng.Analysis on Deficiency of Administrative Law Protection of Dwelling Right in China[J].Administrative Law Review,2006(1):43-50.
Authors:XIAO Ze-sheng
Abstract:The dwelling right is a right to freedom prescribed in the constitution, but its protection is still blind in the administrative law. Even if we just concern the protection of dwelling right in the sense of right to freedom, there are still many deficiencies in administrative law. First, the scope of residency and the standard of unlawful intrusion are not clear in the Regulations of PRC on Punishments in Public Order and Security Administration; Second, there exist many negligence in Regulations Governing Urban House Demolition and Relocation and Law of PRC on Land Administration in the protection of citizen's dwelling right. Third, the dwelling right has no remedy actually, and it is regarded as property right in the present, and get few remedy according to administrative litigation law and state compensation law.
Keywords:Dwelling Right  Administrative Law  Unlawful Intrusion  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号