首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论陷阱抗辩的证明责任分配
引用本文:聂昭伟,魏云燕.论陷阱抗辩的证明责任分配[J].四川警官高等专科学校学报,2007,19(1):28-33.
作者姓名:聂昭伟  魏云燕
作者单位:浙江省高级人民法院 浙江杭州310121
摘    要:诱惑侦查是一种对付某些犯罪的有效侦查方法,但如果超过合理限度就会转化为陷阱侦查。陷阱侦查不仅与侦查机关的职责相悖,而且侵犯了公民的合法权益。为了对陷阱侦查行为进行有效规制,并为被告人提供有效的救济途径,除了需要明确陷阱侦查的判断标准以及法律后果之外,更重要的是合理地分配证明责任。根据证明责任的分配原理,在陷阱抗辩中首先应当由被告人承担证明责任。

关 键 词:陷阱侦查  陷阱抗辨  证明责任
文章编号:1009-8410(2007)01-0028-06
修稿时间:2006年5月25日

How to Allot the Burden of Proof in Entrapment Defense
Authors:NIE Zhao-wei  WEI Yun-yan
Institution:NIE Zhao-wei WEI Yun-yan
Abstract:As an effctive means to deal with some kinds of crimes,induced investigation which exceeds the legal degree will convert to investigative entrapment.Investigative entrapment not nly vilolates the duty of the investigative organ,but also infringes on the citizen's legitimate rights and interests. In order to control the investigative entrapment and offer the effective means of remedies,we should estabilish the criterion of judgment and the legal consequence.What's more,how to assing the burden of proof in entrapment defense between the prosecutor and the defendant is more important.According to the the principle of the burden of proof,the defendant should prove the constitution of investigative entrapment firstly.
Keywords:investigative entrapment  entrapment defense  the burden of proof
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号