台湾地区公诉权制约机制及其借鉴意义

近年来台湾地区的刑事诉讼经历了重大的改革，其公诉权制约机制较为完善。对于检察官不起诉、缓起诉处分，立法设置了再议制、交付审判制进行监督和制约，防止检察官滥用不起诉权；对于检察机关的起诉则在审前以起诉审查制进行制约，防止未达起诉法定门槛的案件进入审判。对于大陆来说，其公诉权制约机制有很大的借鉴意义。大陆也应设立公诉权的司法权制约机制，对于检察机关的起诉和不起诉都应最终由法院来进行审查和制约，以保证公诉权合法行使。但对于台湾地区公诉权制约机制的不足之处，借鉴的同时需予以改进。

Restriction of Public Prosecution Power in China's Taiwan District and Its Enlightenment

In recent years,the criminal procedure of Taiwan experienced great reform, and its restriction system of public prosecution power is comparatively perfect. To nonprosecution or delayed prosecution, the criminal proeedure code sets up hierarchy review and judicial review to prevent procurators from abusing nonprosecution power. To prosecution, prosecution examination is effective to exclude illegitimate prosecution. Therefore Taiwan＇s restriction system of public prosecution power has considerable enlightenment to Chinese Mainland, where all nonproseeution and prosecution decision should be reviewed and restricted by judicial power. However, we should also pay attention to the defects in Taiwan＇s restriction system of public prosecution power.