首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

司法民主化的追问
引用本文:吴元中. 司法民主化的追问[J]. 福建警察学院学报, 2012, 0(6): 87-93
作者姓名:吴元中
作者单位:山东省济南市市中区法院,山东济南250002
摘    要:民主与司法是两种不同的权力和政治过程,不能以一种事物的属性来改造另一种事物,否则就会对事物造成破坏,因此让一种事物他化的提法本身就是错误的。而宪法是民主的产物和最高体现,所以权力的合宪化就是权力民主化的最高体现,司法权的民主化也只能表现为合宪化而不是受宪法外权威的操纵和支配,因为那只会使司法权异化并根本上破坏权力的民主性质。因此,司法权对这些因素应当进行抵制而不是迎合,司法合宪化才是民主的真谛。

关 键 词:司法  民主  司法民主化  司法合宪化

Inquiry on Judicial Democracy
WU Yuan-zhong. Inquiry on Judicial Democracy[J]. ournal of Fujian Police Academy, 2012, 0(6): 87-93
Authors:WU Yuan-zhong
Affiliation:WU Yuan-zhong (the People's Court of Shizhong District,Jinan City,Jinan 250002,China)
Abstract:Democracy and justice are two different types of power and political process. The property of one matter should not be used to change the property of another. Otherwise, it will be destroyed, the pro- posal that let one thing be another is regarded as a mistake. The constitution is a product of democracy and the supreme embodiment of democracy,so the constitutional right is the supreme embodiment of the right to democracy. Judicial democratization only manifests constitutionality and cannot be controlled and domi- nated by the power beyond the constitution. Or else,it will dissimilate the iudicial power and do harm to democracy nature of the power. Therefore, the judicial power must resist these factors, not pander to them. The judicial constitutionality is the core of democracy.
Keywords:judiciary  democracy  judicial democratization  judicial constitutionality
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号