首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

回归民事诉讼法——法院依职权调查取证的再改革
引用本文:李浩.回归民事诉讼法——法院依职权调查取证的再改革[J].法学家,2011(3).
作者姓名:李浩
作者单位:南京师范大学法学院;
基金项目:国家社科基金重大招标项目“维护司法公正和社会公平正义研究”(项目编号:10ZD&043)的阶段性研究成果
摘    要:民事诉讼法授权法院依职权收集审理案件所需要的证据,为法院依职权调查取证留下了较大的空间。在民事司法改革过程中,这一权力被极度缩小,使得我国法院依职权收集证据的权力明显小于德国、法国等大陆法系国家。通过发现真实达致实体公正是包括我国在内的各国民事诉讼制度的根本目的,过分限缩法院依职权调查取证的权力妨碍了实体公正的实现,已经产生了多方面的负面效应。因此需要对以往的改革进行检讨,并通过适当扩大法院依职权调查收集证据的权力,在民事诉讼中建立科学的案件事实发现机制。

关 键 词:民事诉讼法  实体公正  依职权收集证据  

The Regression of Civil Procedure Law:From the Perspective of Re-reform of Court's Authority to Conduct Investigation and Collect Evidence
LI Hao Professor of Nanjing Normal University Law School.The Regression of Civil Procedure Law:From the Perspective of Re-reform of Court's Authority to Conduct Investigation and Collect Evidence[J].Jurists Review,2011(3).
Authors:LI Hao Professor of Nanjing Normal University Law School
Institution:LI Hao Professor of Nanjing Normal University Law School
Abstract:The P.R.C Civil Procedure Law has empowered the courts to collect necessary evidence in case hearing,which has created a broad scope for the court's authority to conduct investigation and collect evidence.However,such authority has been severely reduced in the process of civil judicial reform,which has led to the result that the courts' authority to collect evidence is much weaker than that of the continental law countries,such as Germany and France.The fundamental aim of the civil procedure law system of e...
Keywords:Civil Procedure Law  Substantial Justice  Authority to Collect Evidence  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号