|
|||||
|
|
Weighing the parody factor in a trade mark infringement and dilution case |
|
| Authors: | Teng Simon |
| Affiliation: | US Attorney-at-Law, MD |
| Abstract: | On appeal, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court'sdecision that Haute Diggity Dog's (HDD) parody pet toys of famousbrands was not likely to cause confusion with those of LouisVuitton Malletier's (LVM) products. LVM's copyright, trade markdilution, and other claims were also rejected. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录！ | |