首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

单眼球摘除(缺失)医疗损害伤残鉴定25例分析
引用本文:邢庭,顾晓生.单眼球摘除(缺失)医疗损害伤残鉴定25例分析[J].中国法医学杂志,2020(3):313-315,320.
作者姓名:邢庭  顾晓生
作者单位:江苏省人民检察院
基金项目:2018年度江苏省第五期“333工程”科研资助立项项目(BRA2018305)。
摘    要:目的采用比较单眼球摘除适用不同鉴定标准产生的差异,探讨规范统一的医疗损害伤残鉴定标准的价值。方法收集并分析最高人民法院“中国裁判文书网”公开数据中的25例“单眼球摘除(缺失)”裁判文书中医疗损害伤残程度鉴定结果。结果在医疗损害伤残程度鉴定中,因适用不同的伤残鉴定标准“单眼球摘除(缺失)”伤残等级结果存在显著的结果差异。结论从标准适用视角分析伤残等级结果差异的原因并提出解决思路,旨在规范统一医疗损害伤残鉴定标准。

关 键 词:医疗损害鉴定  伤残鉴定标准  裁判数据  眼球摘除

Analysis of 25 cases of single eyeball removal(missing)medical damage and disability identification
Xing Ting,Gu Xiaosheng.Analysis of 25 cases of single eyeball removal(missing)medical damage and disability identification[J].Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine,2020(3):313-315,320.
Authors:Xing Ting  Gu Xiaosheng
Institution:(Jiangsu Provincial People’s Procuratorate,Nanjing 210024,China)
Abstract:Objective The differences between the different identification criteria applied by the single eyeball removal were compared,and the significance of the standardized medical damage identification standard was discussed.Methods Collect and analyze the results of the identification of medical damage and disability in 25“one-eye removal(missing)”judgment documents in the public data of the“Chinese Judgment Document Network”of the Supreme People's Court.Results In the identification of medical damage disability,there are significant differences in results due to the application of different disability identification criteria“single eyeball removal(missing)”disability grade results.Conclusion Analyze the causes of the differences in disability grade results from the perspective of standard application and propose solutions to the standardization of uniform medical impairment assessment standards.
Keywords:Medical damage identification  Disability identification criteria  Referee data  Eyeball removal
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号