首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

对刑法"不得假释"之规定(81条第二款)的商榷
引用本文:刘强. 对刑法"不得假释"之规定(81条第二款)的商榷[J]. 江西公安专科学校学报, 2002, 0(4): 5-9
作者姓名:刘强
作者单位:上海大学法学院,上海,200000
摘    要:限制假释与世界行刑现代化方向不吻合。对假释在实践中存在的问题应具体分析,但不能因噎废食。我国限制假释的理论依据值得商榷,事实表明:限制假释不利于调动在监服刑犯的改造积极性,不利于他们的重新社会化过程,与监狱法中对罪犯实行惩罚与改造相结合的原则不符;同时,在维护社会的稳定以及体现法律的公正、衔接等方面并非是一个较好的选择。所以,建议对该刑法条款进行修改,并通过对我国假释管理体制的完善,逐步扩大对假释的适用。

关 键 词:假释  限制假释  刑事责任  管理体制
文章编号:1008-8121(2002)04-0005-05
修稿时间:2002-05-21

Discussion to Second term of 81 article in criminal Law with Limiting Parole
LIU Qiang. Discussion to Second term of 81 article in criminal Law with Limiting Parole[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 2002, 0(4): 5-9
Authors:LIU Qiang
Abstract:Limiting parole is against the modernization direction of lawenforceme nt in the world.Specific analysis should be given to the practice problems of parole.We can not sto p eating because of choke.Theoretic foundation in supporting parole has certain confinements.So,limiting parole is not helpful to arouse their re-forming activities andthe procedur e ofre -socialization.Italso notme ets the principle ofcombining punis hment andreforming inthe PrisonLaw.So,we shoulddevelopthe administrative systemfor parole andproperly expan d the parole.
Keywords:p arole  limiting parole  legal responsibility  management system
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号