首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

西方政治思想研究的方法论选择——文本中心主义与语境主义的争论:以马基雅维里为例
引用本文:邱国兵. 西方政治思想研究的方法论选择——文本中心主义与语境主义的争论:以马基雅维里为例[J]. 上海行政学院学报, 2006, 7(2): 31-39
作者姓名:邱国兵
作者单位:中共上海市委党校,200233
摘    要:文本中心主义和语境主义是政治思想史研究中的两大竞争性方法论,它们都致力于重新发掘出古典政治思想文本的真实意图,但取向和侧重却迥异.本文以这两个方法论的代表人物列奥·施特劳斯和昆延·斯金纳对马基雅维里的研究为标本,探究了文本中心主义和语境主义两种方法论在还原文本真实意图上的基本特性以及各自的优越性和可能的缺陷.

关 键 词:政治思想  文本中心主义  语境主义
文章编号:1009-3176(2006)02-031-(9)
修稿时间:2006-02-16

The Optional Methodologies in the Research of Political Thoughts--The Debate between Textism and Contextualism
Qiu Guobing. The Optional Methodologies in the Research of Political Thoughts--The Debate between Textism and Contextualism[J]. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 2006, 7(2): 31-39
Authors:Qiu Guobing
Affiliation:Guobing Qiu
Abstract:Textism and contextualism are competitive methodologies in the study of western political thoughts. Both of them pursuit to find the true meaning of classic literatures of political thoughts, but have differences in the emphases. The representational scholars of these two methodologies are Leo Strauss and Quentin Skinner, through their studies on Machiavel, the main attribute, superiorities and limitations of the methodologies could be detected.
Keywords:Political Thoughts   Textism   Contextualism  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号