| 我国判例制度的建立与完善 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 沈敏荣.我国判例制度的建立与完善[J].上海政法学院学报,2001,16(3):14-17. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 沈敏荣 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于强调知识的创新,强调人的创造力,知识更新加速了,这些都对反垄断法形成冲击,推动反垄断法的发展.有限的判例有效主义可以解决法律规则的抽象与具体生活的变化之间的矛盾,与我国的法律思想与法律传统具有某种相合之处.成文规则的基础地位及其有效性的加强.
|
| 关 键 词： | 反垄断法 有限的判例有效 法律规则 不确定性 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-4525(2001)03-0014-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000年12月7日 |
On the Establishment and Improvement of Case System in China |
| |
| Shen Min-rong.On the Establishment and Improvement of Case System in China[J].Journal of Shanghai Institute of Politics & Law,2001,16(3):14-17. |
| |
| Authors: | Shen Min-rong |
| |
| Abstract: | Owing to the emphasis on the innovation of knowledge and the creativity of human being, the renewal of knowledge is quickened. Anti-trust law is struck and promoted. Validity of limited cases can resolve the contradiction between the abstraction of legal rules and the changes of specific life. It is somewhat similar to Chinese legal thoughts and legal tradition. The fundamental status and validity of statutory rules should be strengthened. |
| |
| Keywords: | anti-trust validity of limited cases legal rules uncertainty |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
