首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Decomposing political knowledge: What is confidence in knowledge and why it matters
Institution:1. Aarhus University, Department of Political Science, Denmark;2. London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Methodology, United Kingdom;1. University of Strathclyde, United Kingdom;2. University of Essex, United Kingdom;1. Université de Montréal, C.P.6128, Succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, H3C 3J7, Canada;2. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Av. Carl Friedrich Gauss, 5, Parc Mediterrani de la Tecnologia, 08860, Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain;1. Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, USA;2. Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland;1. University of Essex, United Kingdom;2. Osaka University, Japan
Abstract:While political knowledge has been conceptually defined with two constructs – accuracy and confidence in factual information – conventional measurement of political knowledge has relied heavily on retrieval accuracy. Without measuring confidence-in-knowledge, it is not possible to rigorously identify different types of political informedness, such as misinformedness and uninformedness. This article theoretically explores the two constructs of knowledge and argues that each construct has unique antecedents and behavioral consequences. We suggest a survey instrument for confidence-in-knowledge and introduce a method to estimate latent traits of retrieval accuracy and confidence separately. Using our original survey that includes the measure of confidence-in-knowledge, we find that misinformed citizens are as engaged in politics as the well-informed, but their active involvement does not guarantee informed political choices. Our findings warrant further theoretical and empirical exploration of confidence in political knowledge.
Keywords:Political knowledge  Retrieval accuracy  Confidence-in-knowledge  IRT model
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号