| 论《道交法》及《交强险条例》有关条文可商权之处 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 万晓运. 论《道交法》及《交强险条例》有关条文可商权之处[J]. 湖北警官学院学报, 2009, 22(5): 65-68 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 万晓运 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南财经政法大学武汉学院,湖北武汉430079 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《道路交通安全法》第75条,第76条是构建我国“机动车第三者责任强制保险”制度的基础,应予充分肯定,但其不足或可商权之处不应忽视。其中关于交通肇事逃逸行为的规定是有悖于保险原理的。该法与《机动车交通事故责任强制保险条例》之间亦存在着矛盾的规定。我国应借鉴他人之成功立法经验,完善交强险制度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 道路交通安全法 机动车第三者责任强制保险 规定 |
Some Factors to Deliberate in Road Safety Act and Compulsory Liability Insurance Regulations for Mobile Traffic Accident |
| |
| Wan Xiaoyun. Some Factors to Deliberate in Road Safety Act and Compulsory Liability Insurance Regulations for Mobile Traffic Accident[J]. JOurnal of Hubei University of Police, 2009, 22(5): 65-68 |
| |
| Authors: | Wan Xiaoyun |
| |
| Affiliation: | Wan Xiaoyun (Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430079, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Although Article 75 and 76 of Law on Road Traffic Safety are the foundation of the system of the third par-ty's liability in machine insurance in China,which is worth of affirmation,the deficiencies should not be ignored.In Law on Road Traffic Safety,the regulations on the escaping behavior after causing a traffic accident goes against principles of insurance.There are some contradictive regulations between Law on Road Traffic Safety and Regulation on Compulsory Traffic Accident Liability Insurance for Motor Vehicles.We should draw on the successful legislation experience all over the world and perfect the system of the third party's liability in machine insurance. |
| |
| Keywords: | Law on Road Traffic Safety the third party's liability in machine insurance regulation |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
