首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

几种行政诉讼证据合法性之辨析
引用本文:金城. 几种行政诉讼证据合法性之辨析[J]. 河北公安警察职业学院学报, 2002, 2(3): 46-50
作者姓名:金城
作者单位:浙江公安高等专科学校,浙江,杭州,310053
摘    要:确立行政诉讼非法证据排除规则,在司法实践中都具有重要价值。在理论上对此展开研究,首先要解决行政诉讼非法证据的内涵界定。为揭示这一内涵,文章选取三种较为特殊的诉讼证据,即(1)“毒树之果”证据。(2)“警察圈套”证据。(3)秘密取得的证据。以此作为切入口,分析这些证据在行政诉讼中的合法性问题,为行政诉讼非法证据规则的研究提供一些基础性成果。

关 键 词:行政诉讼  非法证据  毒树之果  警察圈套  秘密取证
文章编号:1671-2358(2002)03-0046-5
修稿时间:2002-07-30

Discrimination of the Legality of Several Kinds of Administrative Lawsuit Evidence
Jin Cheng. Discrimination of the Legality of Several Kinds of Administrative Lawsuit Evidence[J]. Journal of Hebei Vocational College of Public Security Police, 2002, 2(3): 46-50
Authors:Jin Cheng
Abstract:It is of great significance in judicial practices to set a set of rules for excluding illegal evidencein administrative lawsuit.To study this issue in theory,the connotative definition of illegal evidence in adminis-trative lawsuit must be set first.In order to reveal this connotation,this paper has selected three kinds of spe-cial lawsuit evidence,namely,a. evidence of "fruits of the poisonous tree";b.evidence of "police entrapment";c.evidence obtained secretly.Starting from this point,the paper analyses the legality of these kinds of evi-dence in administrative lawsuit and offers some fundamental achievements for the study of the rules for illegalevidence in administrative lawsuit.
Keywords:administrative lawsuit  illegal evidence  fruits of the poisonous tree  police entrapment  evidence obtained secretly
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号