首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论“死法”
引用本文:兰荣杰. 论“死法”[J]. 江西公安专科学校学报, 2005, 0(1): 29-33
作者姓名:兰荣杰
作者单位:四川大学法学院,四川,成都,610064
摘    要:立法者基于政治精英的功利观念,凭借对话语权和立法权的垄断,意图将精英群体的理性和逻辑转化为社会规范.但是,由于国家理性本身的非完美性,以及国家因身兼立法、管理两职的角色冲突,加之人类本性的非理性、非逻辑因素,立法者的理想化设计往往遭到现实无情的否定,诸多逻辑化的法律成为空具形式的"死法".死法"最严重的恶果并非在于不被遵守,而在于不被信仰.法律丧失了应有的指引、评价功能,合法与非法之间的界限变得模糊,人们不再以法律为标准进行逻辑思考来预测自己的行为后果,而是诉诸与国家博弈的实践经验."死法"个别化的复活又助长了权力寻租的产生.

关 键 词:死法  立法者  违法
文章编号:1008-8121(2005)01-0029-05
修稿时间:2004-10-25

On "Impractical Law"
LAN Rong-jie. On "Impractical Law"[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Public Security College, 2005, 0(1): 29-33
Authors:LAN Rong-jie
Abstract:Because of the sense of political elite fame, legislators tend to convert the ration and logic of the elite group into social standards in the light of monopoly of language power and legislative power.But the ration of the country itself is not perfect, and the character of the man himself is not rational or logical, the ideal design of legislators has to face negation in reality. So many logical laws have become "impractical laws ", the worst consequence of "impractical laws "is not to be obeyed but not to be believed in. The law has lost its fountion of guide and evaluation, the demarcation line of legal or illegal has become unclear, so people will not logically predict their own consequence of action according to law standards.
Keywords:impractical laws "  ,legislator,break the law
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号