论四要件犯罪构成理论的合理性暨对中国刑法学体系的坚持

主张取消四要件犯罪构成理论,推翻现行中国刑法学体系的观点是不可取的。四要件犯罪构成理论是一种历史性的选择,具有历史合理性;符合中国国情,具有现实合理性;逻辑严密、契合认识规律、符合犯罪本质特征,具有内在合理性;与德日三阶层犯罪论体系相比,相对稳定、适合中国诉讼模式,具有优势。当前应坚持罪-责-刑的中国刑法学体系,同时,也应改变静态的研究方法,加强刑事责任理论的探索,注重具体问题的解决,进一步促进中国刑法学体系的完善。

On the Rationality of Quadrilateral Essentials of Crime Composition and Stick to China's Criminal Legal System

The point that protests on abolishing the four elements crime constitution theory and overthrowing Chinese criminal law system is not convictive.Four elements crime constitution theory is a historic choice with the history rationality;in line with China's national conditions with practical rationality;logic rigorous and according with understanding rule and the essential character of crime with inherent rationality;comparing with German-Japan three classes crime constitution theory,it is relative stability and suited to Chinese judicature system,so it has a comparative advantage.Should insist on the current Chinese criminal law system namely crime-responsibility-punishment system.Also should change the static research methods,strengthen the criminal responsibility theory,focus on the resolve of specific problems,and further improve Chinese criminal law system.