| 论四要件犯罪构成理论的合理性暨对中国刑法学体系的坚持 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高铭暄. 论四要件犯罪构成理论的合理性暨对中国刑法学体系的坚持[J]. 中国法学, 2009, 0(2) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高铭暄 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 主张取消四要件犯罪构成理论,推翻现行中国刑法学体系的观点是不可取的。四要件犯罪构成理论是一种历史性的选择,具有历史合理性;符合中国国情,具有现实合理性;逻辑严密、契合认识规律、符合犯罪本质特征,具有内在合理性;与德日三阶层犯罪论体系相比,相对稳定、适合中国诉讼模式,具有优势。当前应坚持罪-责-刑的中国刑法学体系,同时,也应改变静态的研究方法,加强刑事责任理论的探索,注重具体问题的解决,进一步促进中国刑法学体系的完善。
|
| 关 键 词： | 四要件犯罪构成理论 三阶层犯罪论体系 中国刑法学体系 |
On the Rationality of Quadrilateral Essentials of Crime Composition and Stick to China's Criminal Legal System |
| |
| Gao Mingxuan. On the Rationality of Quadrilateral Essentials of Crime Composition and Stick to China's Criminal Legal System[J]. China Legal Science, 2009, 0(2) |
| |
| Authors: | Gao Mingxuan |
| |
| Abstract: | The point that protests on abolishing the four elements crime constitution theory and overthrowing Chinese criminal law system is not convictive.Four elements crime constitution theory is a historic choice with the history rationality;in line with China's national conditions with practical rationality;logic rigorous and according with understanding rule and the essential character of crime with inherent rationality;comparing with German-Japan three classes crime constitution theory,it is relative stability and suited to Chinese judicature system,so it has a comparative advantage.Should insist on the current Chinese criminal law system namely crime-responsibility-punishment system.Also should change the static research methods,strengthen the criminal responsibility theory,focus on the resolve of specific problems,and further improve Chinese criminal law system. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
