| 违法所得没收程序相关问题研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈宏,;张红粱. 违法所得没收程序相关问题研究[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2014, 0(6): 118-123 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈宏, 张红粱 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]重庆市沙坪坝区人民检察院,重庆400030; [2]西南政法大学,重庆401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 重庆市人民检察院重点课题“违法所得没收程序研究” |
| |
| 摘 要： | 新《刑诉法》中规定了违法所得没收程序,该程序在实践中适用并不多,理论上的争议却不少。总体上,应当肯定该程序设立的积极意义,并承认其是一种具有一定特殊性的刑事诉讼程序。在达成上述共识的基础上,就可以对此程序中涉及的适用范围、证明标准、权利救济等理论和实践层面出现的具体争议做出法理上一以贯之、实践中规范可行的合理解释:在目前阶段,该程序适用范围应做严格解释;证明标准应较一般刑事案件的排除合理怀疑适当放宽;权利救济应进一步细化和加强监督。
|
| 关 键 词： | 违法所得没收 刑事程序 法理论述 实践规范 |
On the Procedure of Confiscating Illegal Gains |
| |
| Affiliation: | CHEN Hong , ZHANG ttong-liang ( 1. The People＇s Procuratorate of Shapingba District of Chongqing, Chongqing 400030 ; 2. Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The new criminal procedure law prescribed the procedure of confiscating illegal gains which is not widely adopted in practice, yet being fiercely disputed theoretically. In general, the prescription＇ s positive effect shall be approved, and it shall be regarded as a special criminal procedure. On this premise, a theoretically concordant and feasible interpretation can be put forward concerning the procedure＇ s scope of application, the standard of proof, the right relief in both theory and practice, that is, at present the scope of application of this procedure shall be strictly confined, the standard of proof shall be less rigid than that of the normal criminal cases, and the right relief shall be more specific and be supervised strictly. |
| |
| Keywords: | confiscating illegal gains criminal procedure legal theory discussion normalization in practice |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
