阻却违法性事由错误的重新定性——以“假想防卫”为例

阻却违法性事由错误的问题在我国刑法通说上一直被简单地按照事实认识错误的原则来处理的,但是对于这个似乎没有太大争议的观念下依然有着一些值得我们重新思考的问题,比如关于阻却违法性事由的错误到底是否属于事实错误,以及直接按照事实错误的原则来处理是否真正合理。事实上这无法解决关于阻却违法性事由错误行为的恶意的共犯问题。以假想防卫为例借鉴法律效果的限制责任理论,可以重新认识和解决阻却违法性事由的错误问题。

On the Recharacterization of Cognition Errors of the Cause of Obstructing

The problem of cognition errors of the cause of obstructing the breaks of the law is usually simply dealt with the principle of cognition errors of facts,but there is still something to rethink,for example,whether the cognition errors of cause of obstructing the breaks of the law can classified as cognition errors of facts,and deal with the principle of it.In fact,this method can not solve malevolent accomplice. If the theory of liability limitation in legal effect is introduced on imaginary defense ,we can recognition and solve the problem of cognition errors of the cause of obstructing the breaks of the law.