首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

如实回答与沉默权的功能主义分析与文化解释
引用本文:白冬.如实回答与沉默权的功能主义分析与文化解释[J].法学杂志,2012,33(2):113-118.
作者姓名:白冬
作者单位:天津财经大学法学院,天津,300222
基金项目:天津财经大学科研发展基金研究项目“刑事诉讼机制论”(Y0901)”研究成果之一
摘    要:如实回答与沉默权作为一项具体的法律制度属于"人造之物",具有特定的功能。从功能主义出发,梳理如实回答与沉默权在各自不同诉讼结构中的功能性作用,说明其影响诉讼结构之机理。如实回答与沉默权亦是"文化之物"。通过文化解释,剖析如实回答与沉默权所蕴含的价值判断,回答了决定二者废与立的决定性原因。功能主义分析与文化解释的相互补充性的阐释,解决"如何做"的问题。

关 键 词:如实回答  沉默权  功能分析  文化解释

Functional Analysis and Cultural Interpretation to Truthful Answer and Right to Silence
Bai Dong.Functional Analysis and Cultural Interpretation to Truthful Answer and Right to Silence[J].Law Science Magazine,2012,33(2):113-118.
Authors:Bai Dong
Abstract:Answering truthfully and the right to silence, as a specific legal system, belongs to the "man-made objects" and have a specific function. However, they are the product of culture in stead of any design objects. Functional analysis solves such a problem as what roles answering truthfully and the right to silence play in the lawsuit structure. Culture can explain value judgment that contains in answering truthfully and the right to silence. To "annul" or to "establish" answering truthfully and the right to silence ultimately depends on the cultural value judgment.
Keywords:truthful answer the right to silence functionalism cultural interpretation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号