首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Overreaching In Registered Land Law
Authors:Nicola Jackson
Affiliation:University of Manchester
Abstract:Beneficial interests under a trust were not intended to be overriding interests under section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925. The position was altered by Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd v Boland , which determined that an interest under a trust for sale would bind a purchaser if the beneficiary were in actual occupation. The decision raised the question whether such interests could be overreached once the beneficiary was in occupation of the trust property. City of London Building Society v Flegg held that the relevant beneficial interest had been overreached. Both decisions assume that overreaching in registered conveyancing takes effect as it does in unregistered land. Yet there is considerable evidence that the Land Registration Act contains its own overreaching machinery. The House of Lords applied the wrong overreaching provisions in Boland and Flegg and there is no legal basis on which to recognise that trust interests can override a subsequent disposition under section 70(1)(g).
Keywords:Overreaching powers of trustees in registered land    Minor and Overriding Trust Interests    Restrictions    the Land Transfer Acts 1875–1897    the Law of Property Act 1925    ss 2 and 27    the Land Registration Act 1925    ss 3(xv)    20    49(1)(d)    58(3)    70(1)(g)    74    94    the Land Registration Act 2002    ss 11    28    29    40–47    78    scheds 1(2)    3(2)    Williams & Glyn's Bank Ltd. v. Boland [1981] AC 487    City of London Building Society v Flegg [1988] 1 AC 54.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号