混淆"过渡时期"与"共产主义第一阶段"的后果

关于如何认识现阶段中国的社会主义,理论上还有许多说不清道不明的地方,特别是存在着同马克思、列宁的社会主义理论在逻辑上保持一致的问题。多年来,许多研究者把凡是不能一致起来的说法都看作是理论上的"发展",结果引出更多的麻烦。斯大林以来的社会主义理论包括中国"社会主义初级阶段"理论,形式上都是在马克思的社会主义理论框架内建立起来的,实际上却存在着混淆马克思讲的"过渡时期"和"共产主义第一阶段"的重大问题。社会主义理论从马克思到当代的变化,就其中的"麻烦"而言,多源于这个"混淆"。本文第一部分首先叙述斯大林社会主义观的变化,论证了斯大林以来的现实社会主义,是没有完成马克思讲的过渡时期任务的社会主义,并未进入马克思讲的共产主义第一阶段,中国的"社会主义初级阶段",也不是共产主义第一阶段的初级阶段。本文第二部分,是对由于上述混淆而产生的种种问题,主要是理论上的麻烦,作举要分析和简明解释,这是本文的主题内容。最后是一点补充说明。

Consequence from Confusing "Transition Period" and "First Stage of Communism"

Theoretically, there remain some questions on how to comprehend the socialism in China of the present stage, especially, the questions consistent with Marx and Lenin socialist theory logically. For many years, a lot of researchers have regarded every statement that is unanimous as "development" in theory, which produces more trouble. The socialist theories since Stalin, including China' s theory of "primary stage of socialism" , are all set up in the frame of Marx socialist theory in form. But in fact, there exists an important issue of confusing "transition period" and "first stage of communism". From Marx to contemporary stage, among the changes of socialist theory, troubles mostly come from the confusion. The first part of this text narrates Stalin' s change of his socialist theory and proves that the realistic socialism since Stalin is the one that does not finish the tasks of transition period as Marx says. So it does not reach communism that Marx mentioned as the first stage. "Primary stage of socialism" in China is not the primary stage of first stage of communism. The second part of this text, the thematic content, mainly illustrates and analyzes the problems and troubles in theory mentioned above. The last part makes some additional remarks.