首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论枉法裁决罪的认定(下)
引用本文:陈忠谦.论枉法裁决罪的认定(下)[J].仲裁研究,2011(1).
作者姓名:陈忠谦
作者单位:广州仲裁委员会;
摘    要:《刑法修正案(六)》第20条规定的罪名,是枉法裁决罪,而非枉法仲裁罪,称为枉法仲裁罪易致误解,并极易扩大修正案确定的适用范围。基于仲裁与诉讼的诸多不同,在枉法裁决罪的认定和适用上,不能简单地参照民事、行政枉法裁判罪的标准,而应在协调与仲裁立法(含《仲裁法》、《民事诉讼法》)及国际公约内容内在逻辑一致性的基础上,从严把握枉法裁决罪的犯罪构成及定案标准。

关 键 词:仲裁  枉法裁决罪  诉讼  区别  认定标准  

Cognizance of Law-bending Judgment Crime
Chen Zhongqian.Cognizance of Law-bending Judgment Crime[J].Arbitration Study,2011(1).
Authors:Chen Zhongqian
Institution:Chen Zhongqian
Abstract:Criminal Law Amendment(6)Article 20law-bending judgment crimeinstead oflaw-bending ruling crime,as law-bending ruling crime prone to cause misunderstanding,and easily extend the amendment identified application.Based on the difference between the arbitration and litigation,the identification and application of law-bending judgment crime are not simply refer to the standards of Pervert the Law in Terms of the Civil,Administration,but it should be in coordination with arbitration legislation(includingThe Peop...
Keywords:arbitration  law-bending judgment crime  litigation  difference  recognized standards  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号