首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

醉驾案件中醉酒标准认定之思考
引用本文:孔祥承,聂友伦. 醉驾案件中醉酒标准认定之思考[J]. 行政与法, 2020, 0(3): 91-99
作者姓名:孔祥承  聂友伦
作者单位:中国社会科学院法学研究所;中国人民大学法学院
基金项目:国家社科基金重点项目“刑事审判中心主义模式研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:15AFX0140。
摘    要:目前,司法机关对危险驾驶犯罪的醉酒认定标准较为宽松,导致实践中部分无社会危害性的行为被纳入犯罪圈。为贯彻新时代良法善治的刑事司法理念,对危险驾驶犯罪中醉酒标准的认定应持审慎态度,建议借助证据法遏止醉酒驾驶行为过度犯罪化倾向,对于危险驾驶犯罪中的醉酒认定不宜过度依赖血液酒精鉴定,侦查机关应充分收集各类证据,统一交由审判者依其理性最终确定该行为是否构成犯罪。

关 键 词:醉酒驾驶  认定标准  法定证据  证明标准

Handling of Drunk Driving Dangerous Drunk Driving
Kong Xiangcheng,Nie Youlun. Handling of Drunk Driving Dangerous Drunk Driving[J]. Public Administration & Law, 2020, 0(3): 91-99
Authors:Kong Xiangcheng  Nie Youlun
Abstract:At present,the identification of drunk driving da ngerous driving crime by judicial organs is relatively loose,which leads to some non social harmful behaviors being included in the criminal circle in practice.In order to carry out the criminal justice concept of good law and good governance in the new era,we need to take a cautious attitude towards the identification of drunk driving dangerous driving crime,and use evidence law to curb the tendency of excessive criminality of drunk driving behavior.It is suggested that in the future,the identification of drunk driving dangerous driving crime should not rely too much on blood alcohol identification,but should require the investigation organ to fully collect all kinds of evidence and submit it to trial in a unified way According to their own psychological evidence,they finally determine whether the act constitutes a crime.
Keywords:drunk driving  recognition standard  legal evidence  certification standard
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号