| 论所有权保留买卖中天然孳息的归属 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张海鹏,陈贵铨. 论所有权保留买卖中天然孳息的归属[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2012, 0(5): 67-69 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张海鹏 陈贵铨 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆,401120 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于所有权保留买卖中天然孳息的归属,《物权法》与《合同法》的规定存在冲突.从解释论出发,我国的所有权保留应被定性为“契约的附停止条件”,我国的天然孳息归属规则采用的是“结合主义”.在所有权保留买卖中,天然孳息的归属仍应采“交付主义”,《合同法》第163条于理有据、规定合理,仍可适用.当涉及第三人时,孳息的归属则需要具体讨论.
|
| 关 键 词： | 所有权保留 天然孳息 交付主义 |
On the Ownership of Natural Fruits In The Sale of Title Retention |
| |
| ZHANG Hai-peng , CHEN Gui-quan. On the Ownership of Natural Fruits In The Sale of Title Retention[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2012, 0(5): 67-69 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Hai-peng CHEN Gui-quan |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Hai-peng,CHEN Gui-quan |
| |
| Abstract: | Concerning the ownership of natural fruits in the sale of title retention,the rules in Property Law and Contract Law have some conflicts.From the perspective of interpretative theory,the title retention in our country should be defined as stop condition in a contract.The rule of the ownership of natural fruits in our country is combinationism.In the sale of title retention,the rule of the ownership of natural fruits should still consist on the principle of delivery.Article 163 of Contract Law has its rationality and theoretical basis and should be applied in the future.When it concerns the third party,however,the ownership of fruits needs some other detailed discussion. |
| |
| Keywords: | title retention natural fruits principle of delivery |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
