| 侵权责任法视野中的生态损害 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李承亮.侵权责任法视野中的生态损害[J].现代法学,2010,32(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李承亮 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "塔斯曼海"案的处理取得较为圆满的结果,而"松花江重大水污染责任事故"的处理却遭遇尴尬局面。这证明了行政处罚不能取代民事侵权责任,侵权责任法不应当对生态损害视而不见。侵权责任法虽然不能提供填补生态损害的直接依据,但能够利用生态损害与传统损害之间的重叠关系,在填补物(资产性的生态环境组成要素)之所有人的损害时兼顾生态损害。
|
| 关 键 词： | 生态损害 直接模式 间接模式 恢复原状 价值赔偿 |
Eco-injury:From the Perspective of Law of Torts |
| |
| LI Cheng-liang.Eco-injury:From the Perspective of Law of Torts[J].Modern Law Science,2010,32(1). |
| |
| Authors: | LI Cheng-liang |
| |
| Institution: | LI Cheng-liang(Law School of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Tasman Sea case has brought a successful close. In comparison,disposal of the Songhuajiang River pollution seems not so satisfactory,which demonstrates that administrative sanction can never replace tort liability and tort law shall not ignore eco-injury. Though law of torts cannot afford immediate authorities to remedy eco-injury,it can take advantage of overlapping of eco-injury and traditional injury to redress eco-injury concurrently while redressing injury caused by a thing of someone (an element o... |
| |
| Keywords: | eco-injury direct mode indirect mode restitution value compensation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
