| 反诉制度适用之反思--兼论民事诉讼公正与效率的最大化融合之途径 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张晋红. 反诉制度适用之反思--兼论民事诉讼公正与效率的最大化融合之途径[J]. 法律科学, 2002, 0(5): 96-103 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张晋红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 张晋红（广东商学院法学院,广东,广州,510320） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 反诉作为一项重要的诉讼制度,在民事诉讼实践中并没有得到应有的落实,恰恰相反,反诉制度的适用常常遭遇障碍.导致反诉制度适用遇阻的原因是多方面的,包括反诉立法的制度性缺位、理论研究的不当和法院及法官的自利意识等.反诉制度是实现民事诉讼公正与效率最大化融合的途径之一,因此,必须通过立法的完善、反诉理论研究的深化和法院系统对法律统一实施理念的树立,确保反诉制度的有效适用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 反诉制度 适用 公正与效率 保障 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5307(2002)05-0096-(8) |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-10-05 |
On the Application of Counterclaim Institution |
| |
| ZING Jin-hong. On the Application of Counterclaim Institution[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2002, 0(5): 96-103 |
| |
| Authors: | ZING Jin-hong |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZING Jin-hong |
| |
| Abstract: | Counterclaim, as an important litigation institution, is not being properly carried out in the civil litigation practice. There are many reasons that the application of counterclaim is obstructed, such as the institutional drawbacks of counterclaim legislation, improper theoretical research, self-benefit consciousness of the courts and so on. So in order to safeguard the effective application of the counterclaim institution, we should perfect the respective legislation, deepen our theoretical research and establish the consciousness of legal unity in the court systems. |
| |
| Keywords: | counterclaim application fairness and efficiency safeguard |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
