首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

超期羁押的刑事责任分析
引用本文:林水湖,郭志忠. 超期羁押的刑事责任分析[J]. 福建公安高等专科学校学报, 2004, 18(6): 42-45
作者姓名:林水湖  郭志忠
作者单位:泉州市公安局 福建泉州362000(林水湖),泉州市公安局 福建泉州362000(郭志忠)
摘    要:每一项刑事司法制度 ,都表现了一种利弊的双向性 ,只有正确执行 ,才能体现出利 ;错误执行 ,则体现出弊。超期羁押便是对刑事司法制度的错误执行 ,已体现出其严重的社会危害性。但是单从保障诉讼进程的效果看 ,超期羁押无疑是个很好的办法 ,这使得人们对超期羁押现象抱宽容的态度 ,从而产生观念障碍。犯罪的本质是对刑法所保护的权益的侵犯 ,超期羁押明显地侵犯了刑法所保护的人身自由权 ,基于此 ,超期羁押的实质是非法拘禁 ,并应据此追究有关人员的刑事责任。

关 键 词:超期羁押  行为性质  刑事责任
文章编号:1008-6048(2004)06-0042-04
修稿时间:2004-06-14

An Analysis on the Criminal Responsibilities for Extending Detention
LIN Shui-hu,GUO Zhi-zhong. An Analysis on the Criminal Responsibilities for Extending Detention[J]. The Study of Social Public Security, 2004, 18(6): 42-45
Authors:LIN Shui-hu  GUO Zhi-zhong
Abstract:Every criminal judicial system has both its advantages and disadvantages however, its advantages will only be revealed if it is properly displayed and vice versa. The extending detention is a false implementation for criminal judicial system and has produced serious social damages. Nevertheless, if we simply consider it from the effect of insurance procedure, there is no question that extending detention is a good way to show tolerance for it thus evokes conceptual obstacles. The nature of crime is to infringe upon the interests protected by criminal law, and extending detention obviously infringes the personal liberty, therefore, this article draws the conclusion that the nature of extending detention is illegal so accordingly we should look into relevant persons' criminal responsibilities.
Keywords:extending detention  nature of behavior  criminal responsibility
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号