国际法对人道主义干涉的否定与再考虑

有的国际法学者认为人道主义干涉在 19世纪末已经成为习惯国际法 ,另外一些国际法学者不同意这种看法。即使认为人道主义干涉曾经是习惯国际法 ,它也已经在 2 0世纪被国际法确定为非法。但是 ,由于 2 0世纪的国际法对于解决发生于国家内部的严重人道主义问题没有给出积极的规范 ,因而人道主义干涉的合法性问题在国际法学界依然争论不休。19世纪式的人道主义干涉极易被强权国家所利用 ,不应当使其合法化 ;而发生在国家内部的严重人道主义问题又需要采取必要的人道主义行动。因此 ,人道主义干涉是国际法不得不考虑的问题。本文认为 ,正确的方向应当是进一步完善安理会采取人道主义干涉行动的程序制度。

The Negation ind Re-thinking of International Law Towards Humanitarian Intervention

Some scholars of International Law held the point of view that the humanitarian intervention had become the customary rules by the end of the 19th century, although other scholars did not agree to that. No matter what had happened before, the humanitarian intervention was unlawful in accordance with the International Law in the 20th century. However, as the International Law in the 20th century did not do active things abused to end those humanitarian horrors taking place within the territory of a country, the validity of humanitarian intervention has still been a vexed topic among the jurists of the International Law. With the existence of humanitarian horrors, humanitarian intervention has to be reconsidered by modern International Law. Meanwhile, the legitimization of unilateral humanitarian intervention is unacceptable as it was easily abused by power politics. The author thinks that the right way is to develop the due process of Security Council for humanitarian intervention.