首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

4种固相颗粒吸附法提取滤纸血痕DNA效果的比较
引用本文:巴华杰,马骏,刘亚楠,朱爱华,林子清.4种固相颗粒吸附法提取滤纸血痕DNA效果的比较[J].中国法医学杂志,2016(4):369-372.
作者姓名:巴华杰  马骏  刘亚楠  朱爱华  林子清
作者单位:1. 常州市公安局刑警支队,江苏常州,213003;2. 上海市公安局物证鉴定中心上海市现场物证重点实验室,上海,200083;3. 中国刑警学院法医学系,辽宁沈阳,110035
摘    要:目的探讨4种固相颗粒吸附法提取滤纸血痕样本DNA的效果。方法含有1μL静脉血的滤纸血痕180份,分为4组,每组45份。分别采用4种固相颗粒吸附法(DNAIQ~(TM)系统、D盾超敏DNA提取试剂盒、超高效硅珠纯化DNA提取试剂盒和常规的硅珠法)对上述样本进行DNA提取,对比各组DNA溶液的浓度及STR分型检验结果。结果 D盾超敏DNA提取试剂盒(3.764±1.790)μg/mL]、超高效硅珠纯化DNA提取试剂盒(3.634±1.112)及常规硅珠法(3.350±1.250)提取到DNA溶液的浓度无统计学差异(P0.05),但均高于DNA IQ~(TM)系统(1.864±1.207)(P0.001);D盾超敏DNA提取试剂盒、超高效硅珠纯化DNA提取试剂盒及常规硅珠法样本图谱峰高大于DNA IQ~(TM)系统(P0.001),超高效硅珠纯化DNA提取试剂盒和常规硅珠法样本图谱峰高大于D盾超敏DNA提取试剂盒(P0.01)。结论 D盾超敏DNA提取试剂盒、超高效硅珠纯化DNA提取试剂盒及常规硅珠法对于滤纸血痕的DNA提取效率高于DNA IQ~(TM)系统;超高效硅珠纯化DNA提取试剂盒和常规硅珠提取到的DNA溶液可能具有更高的质量。

关 键 词:法医物证学  DNA提取  固相颗粒吸附  滤纸血痕

Comparative study of DNA extration of bloodstain on the iflter paper with four methods of solid phase adsorption
Ba Huajie;Ma Jun;Liu Yanan;Zhu Aihua;Lin Ziqing.Comparative study of DNA extration of bloodstain on the iflter paper with four methods of solid phase adsorption[J].Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine,2016(4):369-372.
Authors:Ba Huajie;Ma Jun;Liu Yanan;Zhu Aihua;Lin Ziqing
Institution:Ba Huajie;Ma Jun;Liu Yanan;Zhu Aihua;Lin Ziqing;Public Security Bureau of Changzhou;Key Laboratory of Crime Scene Evidence of Shanghai,Institute of Forensic Science of Public Security Bureau of Shanghai;China Criminal Police College;
Abstract:Objective To discuss the effect of DNA extraction of bloodstain on the filter paper with four methods of solid phase absorption.Methods 180 bloodstain samples on the iflter paper, each one contains 1 microlitre anticoagulation peripheral venous blood, divided into 4 groups with 45 samples, respectively. All samples were treated with four methods of solid phase absorption, i.e. DNA IQ? System, D-shield sensitive DNA Extraction Kit, High efficiency Silica Bead DNA Extraction Kit and Conventional silica bead method. The concentration of DNA and the results of STR typing of four groups were compared each other.Results The concentration of DNA was 3.764±1.790μg/mL and 3.634±1.112μg/mL by using D-shield sensitive DNA Extraction Kit and High efifciency Silica Bead DNA Extraction Kit, respectively. However, the concentration of DNA by using Conventional silica bead method group (3.350±1.250) was not signiifcantly different from each other (P<0.05), while the concentration of DNA extracted with above three methods were higher than by using DNA IQ? System (1.864±1.207)(P<0.001); Signiifcant differences of peak height existed between DNA IQ? System and other three methods (P<0.001); As the same time, the peak height of samples by using High efficiency Silica Bead DNA Extraction Kit and Conventional silica bead method were signiifcantly different from D-shield sensitive DNA Extraction Kit (P<0.01).Conclusions The DNA extracted in bloodstain on the iflter paper by using D-shield sensitive DNA Extraction Kit, High efifciency Silica Bead DNA Extraction Kit and Conventional silica bead method was more than DNA IQ? System. Meanwhile, the quality of DNA using High efifciency Silica Bead DNA Extraction Kit and Conventional silica bead method may be higher.
Keywords:forensic biological evidence  DNA extration  solid phase absorption  bloodstain  iflter paper
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号