| 立法含混的法教义学弥补：以刑法第289条为分析样本 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈世伟.立法含混的法教义学弥补：以刑法第289条为分析样本[J].时代法学,2010,8(2):43-49. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈世伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学,重庆,401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2009年国家社会科基金一般项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于现行刑法第289条规定的模糊含混,导致该条文适用过程中歧义丛生,增加了司法适用的难度。通过梳理该条的历史变迁与法益变化,从法教义学角度客观把握＂聚众‘打砸抢’＂的内涵与地位,同时运用＂拟制规定＂与＂注意规定＂分析方法来厘定刑法第289条条文性质并作出合理解释乃消除实践分歧之可行路径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 聚众“打砸抢” 注意规定 拟制规定 判令退赔 |
Legislative Ambiguity and Dogmatical Remedy: On Analysing the Article 289 of Criminal Law |
| |
| CHEN Shi-wei.Legislative Ambiguity and Dogmatical Remedy: On Analysing the Article 289 of Criminal Law[J].Presentday Law Science,2010,8(2):43-49. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Shi-wei |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Shi-wei(Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | It＇s very difficult for justice to apply the the article 289 of criminal law duo to the legislative ambiguity.Trough analysing the historical change of article and interests change,understanding the connotation of the organized beating,smashing,looting from the perspective of dogmatics.At the same time,applying the reminding and legal fiction regulation to analyse the nature of article 289 of the criminal law could get the rational interpretation. |
| |
| Keywords: | organized beating smashing looting reminding regulation legal fiction award an order to return or compensate the property |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
