Parliamentary Questioning in 17 European Parliaments: Some Steps towards Comparison |
| |
Authors: | Federico Russo Matti Wiberg |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Centre for the Study of Political Change , University of Siena , Italy federico.russo@unisi.it;3. University of Turku , Finland E-mail: wiberg@utu.fi |
| |
Abstract: | All democratic parliaments have some procedures to allow representatives to put questions to ministers. However, there are no two parliaments with exactly the same procedures. Cross-national comparisons are hindered by the lack of agreed-upon scientific criteria to group similar procedures, which are too often classified on the basis of their names rather than on their substantive characteristics. To overcome this problem, this article devises a typology of parliamentary questions based on relevant procedural features in 17 European countries. A ranking of parliaments according to the criteria of the effectiveness of procedures is developed and a discussion of the relationship of this ranking to the coalitional characteristics of the parliaments is provided. Finally, the article develops some tentative arguments to explain what influences the development of more or less effective questioning procedures, testing the hypothesis that countries dominated by coalition governments tend to have more effective procedures. In contrast with the authors' expectations, with regard to the countries included in the present analysis, the frequent presence of coalition government is associated with weaker procedures. |
| |
Keywords: | parliamentary questioning legislative assemblies institutions oversight European parliaments |
|
|