骨盆骨折伤残重新鉴定65例分析

目的 研究有争议的交通事故受伤人员骨盆骨折伤残等级评定案例,分析其在初次鉴定中暴露出来的问题,探讨如何正确理解与把握骨盆骨折的鉴定条款,建立科学的判定标准。方法 收集上海市司法鉴定中心2006—2013年道路交通事故致骨盆骨折伤残等级重新鉴定案例65例,对初次鉴定和重新鉴定的资料进行分析比较。结果 鉴定时机不当,鉴定材料收集不全面,鉴定人对骨盆骨折条款的理解有误及其他一系列问题是重新鉴定意见改变伤残等级的主要原因。结论 针对上述问题,应该从提高鉴定人专业技能,建立统一判定标准等方面来提高此类案件的鉴定质量。

Analysis of 65 Reassessment Cases of Pelvic Fracture Impairment

Objective To discuss how to correctly understand and use the assessing terms referring to pelvic fracture, and to establish scientific standards for forensic practice, by investigating controversial impairment assessment cases of pelvis fracture in traffic accidents and analyzing the problems in the primary assessments. Methods 65 impairment assessment cases of pelvic fracture in traffic accidents reappraised by Shanghai Forensic Appraisal Center from 2006 to 2013 were collected. The primary and reappraised opinions were analyzed and compared. Result The main problems of those primary appraisals, in which the expert opinions had been changed in the reappraisal, included inappropriate assessing time, insufficient materials and misun- derstanding of the terms. Conclusion To improve the quality of pelvic fracture impairment assessment, the professional skills of forensic experts should be improved and a unified standard should be established.